{"id":7700,"date":"2026-07-09T20:32:58","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T20:32:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/?p=7700"},"modified":"2026-07-10T21:54:47","modified_gmt":"2026-07-10T21:54:47","slug":"should-i-use-a-disavow-file","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/should-i-use-a-disavow-file\/","title":{"rendered":"Disavow Files in 2026: When NOT to Use Them"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The disavow file is the most over-prescribed fix in SEO. Rankings dip, a tool paints part of the backlink profile red, and someone uploads a list of domains to Google hoping it heals the drop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In most of those cases the file does nothing, and in the worst cases it cuts links that were quietly helping.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is when a disavow genuinely belongs in your plan, and when it does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group wpc-takeaways is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading toc-ignore\">Wichtigste Erkenntnisse<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Google&#8217;s own documentation limits the disavow tool to sites with a manual action (or one likely coming) from links they built; most sites never qualify<\/li><li>Since Penguin 4.0 in 2016, Google devalues spammy links instead of demoting the site, and the December 2022 SpamBrain update neutralizes them at scale<\/li><li>Disavowing from a tool&#8217;s &#8220;toxic score&#8221; regularly cuts real, earning links; that mistake costs rankings while the spam was costing nothing<\/li><li>A recurring disavow habit is really a self-report of your own link building; if the profile keeps needing cleaning, the fix is to stop building manipulative links, not to file a longer list<\/li><li>A ranking drop is not evidence of a link problem; check the Manual actions report and the actual cause of the drop first<\/li><li>The legitimate disavow cases are narrow: a manual action for unnatural links, or a paid-link and PBN history you know exists<\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<style>.kb-table-of-content-nav.kb-table-of-content-id7066_f7400a-9c .kb-table-of-content-wrap{padding-top:var(--global-kb-spacing-sm, 1.5rem);padding-right:var(--global-kb-spacing-sm, 1.5rem);padding-bottom:var(--global-kb-spacing-sm, 1.5rem);padding-left:var(--global-kb-spacing-sm, 1.5rem);border-top:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-right:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-bottom:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-left:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-top-left-radius:5px;border-top-right-radius:5px;border-bottom-right-radius:5px;border-bottom-left-radius:5px;box-shadow:15px 15px 0px 0px rgba(160, 152, 255, 0.31);}.kb-table-of-content-nav.kb-table-of-content-id7066_f7400a-9c .kb-table-of-contents-title-wrap{padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;}.kb-table-of-content-nav.kb-table-of-content-id7066_f7400a-9c .kb-table-of-contents-title{font-weight:regular;font-style:normal;}.kb-table-of-content-nav.kb-table-of-content-id7066_f7400a-9c .kb-table-of-content-wrap .kb-table-of-content-list{color:var(--global-palette1, #3182CE);font-weight:regular;font-style:normal;margin-top:var(--global-kb-spacing-sm, 1.5rem);margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;}@media all and (max-width: 1024px){.kb-table-of-content-nav.kb-table-of-content-id7066_f7400a-9c .kb-table-of-content-wrap{border-top:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-right:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-bottom:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-left:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);}}@media all and (max-width: 767px){.kb-table-of-content-nav.kb-table-of-content-id7066_f7400a-9c .kb-table-of-content-wrap{border-top:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-right:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-bottom:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);border-left:1px solid var(--global-palette10, #3182CE);}}<\/style>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Where the disavow reflex came from<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The reflex is a leftover from 2012. Penguin used to punish sites for bad link profiles, recoveries could take until the next refresh, and an entire industry of link audits and toxic-link scores grew around that fear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Back then aggressive cleanup made real sense, because a bad profile could hold the whole site underwater for months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The tools kept the fear alive long after the algorithm changed. A dashboard that flags a chunk of your backlinks as <strong>&#8220;toxic&#8221;<\/strong> creates urgency out of nothing, and a vendor selling monthly link audits has little reason to correct the impression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So the disavow file became the default response to any ranking drop, which is exactly the wrong lesson to have carried forward.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Google&#8217;s disavow documentation actually says<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Googles <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/webmasters\/answer\/2648487\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">disavow documentation<\/a> is unusually blunt. The tool is meant for sites that have a considerable number of spammy or paid links <strong>und<\/strong> a manual action because of them, or a real reason to expect one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It says most sites will not need the tool at all, and it warns that used incorrectly, the tool can harm your site&#8217;s performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The tool itself says the same thing. It does not even live in the main Search Console navigation anymore; it sits behind a separate page with a caution banner across it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"850\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/google-search-console-disavow-links-tool-7698.avif\" alt=\"Google Search Console disavow links tool page telling site owners it is an advanced feature, with the manual action condition highlighted\" class=\"wp-image-7698\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/google-search-console-disavow-links-tool-7698.avif 1200w, https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/google-search-console-disavow-links-tool-7698-300x213.avif 300w, https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/google-search-console-disavow-links-tool-7698-1024x725.avif 1024w, https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/google-search-console-disavow-links-tool-7698-768x544.avif 768w, https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/google-search-console-disavow-links-tool-7698-18x12.avif 18w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Screenshot: Google&#8217;s disavow tool. The highlighted paragraph is the entire eligibility test, and the caution banner is Google&#8217;s own wording.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I generally treat Google guidance as an interested claim rather than settled fact, and I will get to that caveat in a moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But notice what this doc is doing: Google gains nothing by talking you out of a disavow, so a warning this direct is worth taking seriously.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happens to spammy links now, without a disavow<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two documented changes did most of the work:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>Penguin 4.0, September 2016:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2016\/09\/penguin-is-now-part-of-our-core\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Google moved from demoting sites to devaluing the spam itself<\/a>, adjusting ranking on spam signals rather than punishing the whole site.<\/li><li><strong>The December 2022 link spam update:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2022\/12\/december-22-link-spam-update\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">SpamBrain started neutralizing unnatural links at scale<\/a>, so the links simply stop counting.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Neutralized means the links stop counting in either direction. Any <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/was-ist-link-juice-in-seo\/\">link equity<\/a> they were faking evaporates, but no penalty follows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span class=\"wpc-person\"><a class=\"wpc-person-name\" href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/authors\/john-mueller\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">John Mueller<\/a><span class=\"wpc-person-card\" role=\"tooltip\"><span class=\"wpc-person-head\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpc-person-photo\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/john-mueller-150x150.avif\" alt=\"John Mueller\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><span><span class=\"wpc-person-title\">John Mueller<\/span><span class=\"wpc-person-role\">Search Advocate, Google<\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"wpc-person-bio\">Googles \u201eSearch Advocate\u201c und der wichtigste offizielle Sprecher der Google Search Relations.<\/span><span class=\"wpc-person-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/johnmu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><svg viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><path d=\"M20.447 20.452h-3.554v-5.569c0-1.328-.027-3.037-1.852-3.037-1.853 0-2.136 1.445-2.136 2.939v5.667H9.351V9h3.414v1.561h.046c.477-.9 1.637-1.85 3.37-1.85 3.601 0 4.267 2.37 4.267 5.455v6.286zM5.337 7.433a2.062 2.062 0 0 1-2.063-2.065 2.064 2.064 0 1 1 2.063 2.065zm1.782 13.019H3.555V9h3.564v11.452zM22.225 0H1.771C.792 0 0 .774 0 1.729v20.542C0 23.227.792 24 1.771 24h20.451C23.2 24 24 23.227 24 22.271V1.729C24 .774 23.2 0 22.225 0z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"wpc-link-label\">LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/JohnMu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><svg viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><path d=\"M18.244 2.25h3.308l-7.227 8.26 8.502 11.24H16.17l-5.214-6.817L4.99 21.75H1.68l7.73-8.835L1.254 2.25H8.08l4.713 6.231zm-1.161 17.52h1.833L7.084 4.126H5.117z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"wpc-link-label\">X<\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/authors\/john-mueller\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><svg viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><path d=\"M12.48 10.92v3.28h7.84c-.24 1.84-.853 3.187-1.787 4.133-1.147 1.147-2.933 2.4-6.053 2.4-4.827 0-8.6-3.893-8.6-8.72s3.773-8.72 8.6-8.72c2.6 0 4.507 1.027 5.907 2.347l2.307-2.307C18.747 1.44 16.133 0 12.48 0 5.867 0 .307 5.387.307 12s5.56 12 12.173 12c3.573 0 6.267-1.173 8.373-3.36 2.16-2.16 2.84-5.213 2.84-7.667 0-.76-.053-1.467-.173-2.053H12.48z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"wpc-link-label\">Suchzentrale<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span> has been blunter than the docs. He has said Google&#8217;s systems are really good at dealing with random spammy links, and he calls routine disavow work without a manual action a waste of time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He has also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.searchenginejournal.com\/googles-mueller-slams-negative-seo-link-disavow-companies\/478348\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">accused disavow service sellers of cashing in<\/a> on clients who don&#8217;t know better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now the caveat I promised. &#8220;We handle it&#8221; is a claim from the company that benefits when you stop investigating, so I don&#8217;t take it at face value either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some practitioners still report recoveries after large cleanups, almost always on sites with a genuine manipulation history, and those reports are hard to verify causally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The honest reading: devaluation handles random junk well, and the disputed territory is deliberate, concentrated link schemes, which is exactly where Google&#8217;s own doc already points the tool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>The belief<\/th><th>What the evidence supports<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Spammy links are dragging my rankings down<\/td><td>Google devalues or neutralizes most junk links automatically; they usually pass nothing at all<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>A high toxic score means I must disavow<\/td><td>&#8220;Toxic&#8221; is a tool metric, not Google&#8217;s; tools flag harmless links and real earning links alike<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Disavowing is harmless insurance<\/td><td>Google&#8217;s own doc warns incorrect use can harm performance; over-broad files cut real links<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>My drop must be a negative SEO attack<\/td><td>Drops mostly track algorithm updates, indexing shifts, or measurement; link attacks rarely move rankings on their own<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The four beliefs behind most disavow uploads, next to what the documented evidence actually supports.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The real cost of disavowing from a tool&#8217;s toxic score<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The disavow file gives you no feedback. Google treats it as a strong suggestion to ignore those links, takes weeks to reprocess them as it recrawls, and never tells you what changed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You are steering blind, which is a bad place to make aggressive cuts from.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is what makes over-broad files expensive. Toxic scores are computed from proxies: spammy-looking anchors, low authority metrics, odd TLDs, and real, earning links fail those proxies all the time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The pattern that keeps showing up in audits and community post-mortems is a site disavowing hundreds of domains off a tool export, a handful of which were quietly passing value, and <strong>rankings sag with nothing &#8220;toxic&#8221; left to blame<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The file also keeps costing after upload, because almost nobody remembers it exists. A forgotten disavow file from a previous SEO can sit there suppressing legitimate links for years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you inherit a site, checking for an existing disavow file belongs on your first-week checklist.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What a recurring disavow habit says about your link building<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The tool&#8217;s own scope is the tell. Google built it for links you, or an SEO you hired, actually made: the paid placements, the PBNs, the anchor-stuffed guest posts, paired with a manual action or one you can see coming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So a fat disavow file is really a paper trail of your own link building. Reaching for it every month is not a sign Google is misjudging you; it is a sign the junk is still being built.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If your backlink profile keeps needing a disavow, the honest question is who keeps building the links you keep disavowing. The fix is not a cleaner list, it is not building manipulative links in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To be fair, the file is not quietly &#8220;outing&#8221; you to a reviewer. Google devalued spammy links from 2016, and since the 2022 spam update it effectively ignores them, so random junk usually passes nothing in either direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The real risk from a heavy, self-built spam profile is a different one. As <a href=\"https:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-on-penguin-algorithm-aims-to-ignore-spammy-links-but-can-lead-to-distrusting-your-site-375655\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Search Engine Land reported<\/a>, a strong enough pattern of spammy links can push Penguin to distrust the whole site, rather than ignore the links one by one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is the line Google&#8217;s doc and Mueller&#8217;s &#8220;waste of time&#8221; point both circle. Routine disavowing fixes nothing, but a real, concentrated manipulation history is a genuine liability, and the cure is to stop building it, not to keep filing it away.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When a disavow file is the right call<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A <strong>manual action for unnatural links<\/strong> is the clear case. A human reviewer flagged your profile, it shows in the Manual actions report in Search Console, and cleanup plus a disavow of what you cannot get removed is part of the reconsideration path.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the job the tool was built for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second case is a link history you know is dirty because you, or an SEO you hired, built it: paid placements, a PBN, mass guest posts with commercial anchors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If that past is concentrated enough to invite a manual action, disavowing ahead of one is the doc&#8217;s own &#8220;about to get one&#8221; scenario, and doing it narrowly is cheap insurance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Negative SEO panic is mostly not a case. SpamBrain exists precisely to neutralize hostile junk, and Mueller&#8217;s criticism was aimed at the services selling that panic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If a genuinely concentrated attack worries you, a targeted disavow of that one pattern costs little; just don&#8217;t let it grow into a monthly toxic-link ritual.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What to check before you upload a disavow file<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most drops that get blamed on links turn out to be something else: an algorithm update window, an indexing recount, or a measurement artifact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I have covered how <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/patent-enthullt-dass-google-seos-mit-gefalschten-ranking-ruckgangen-in-die-falle-lockt\/\">Google can engineer drops that look like penalties<\/a> and why <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/search-console-indexed-pages-decreased\/\">a falling indexed-pages count is usually bookkeeping<\/a>, and I wrote on LinkedIn about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pulse\/why-i-stopped-reacting-ranking-drops-google-patent-explains-nouman-n5afc\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">why I stopped reacting to ranking drops<\/a> at all. The disavow question deserves the same discipline, in this order:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wpc-flow\">\n  <p class=\"wpc-flow__title\">The pre-disavow checklist, in order<\/p>\n  <ol class=\"wpc-flow__list\">\n    <li class=\"is-blue\">Open the Manual actions report in Search Console; a real link penalty is named there<\/li>\n    <li class=\"is-teal\">Diagnose the drop itself: update timing, indexing changes, measurement noise<\/li>\n    <li class=\"is-purple\">Ask what you (or a past SEO) actually built: paid links, PBNs, anchor-stuffed guest posts<\/li>\n    <li class=\"is-green\">Only a manual action or a real manipulation history earns a disavow; otherwise leave it alone<\/li>\n  <\/ol>\n  <figcaption class=\"wpc-flow__cap\">The order I follow before anyone touches the disavow tool; most drops never make it past the second step.<\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">So, should you use a disavow file in 2026?<\/h2>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For most sites, no. The tool solves a problem most sites do not have, the evidence says Google already devalues the junk your toxic-score report is worried about, and the downside of an over-broad file is real while the upside is usually zero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If this were my site and I had a manual action, or knew there was a paid-link past behind it, I would disavow without hesitation, narrowly and carefully; that is the tool doing its actual job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everything else is a placebo tax, and the hours are better spent on the pages, the internal links, and the content that actually earn rankings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group wpc-post-cta is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Not sure whether your links are really the problem?<\/h3>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Z\u00f6gern Sie nicht <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/arbeit-mit-wpconsults\/\">kontaktieren Sie uns<\/a> oder <a href=\"mailto:info.wpconsults@gmail.com\">E-Mail<\/a>; I&#8217;ll tell you honestly whether a disavow would help your situation or just waste your time. Remember, diagnosing the drop correctly matters more than reacting to it fast.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group wpc-changelog is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\" id=\"article-update-logs\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u00c4nderungsprotokolle<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>11 Jul 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Added a section on what a recurring disavow habit signals about your own link building, including the Search Engine Land finding that a strong pattern of spammy links can lead Google to distrust the whole site rather than ignore them one by one.<\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Should you use a disavow file in 2026? For most sites, no. Google devalues spammy links on its own; a disavow belongs with manual actions and link schemes you actually built.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7699,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kb_optimizer_status":2,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","rank_math_title":"Should I Use a Disavow File in 2026? Mostly Not","rank_math_description":"Should I use a disavow file? Mostly no. Here is when a disavow helps (manual actions, paid links), when it hurts, and what to check before you upload one.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"should i use a disavow file","_colophon_preset":"regular","_colophon_fc_on":"1","_colophon_edited_on":"1","footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-google-algorithm-decoded"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7700"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7700\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7718,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7700\/revisions\/7718"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wpconsults.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}